Seismic earth forces against embedded retaining walls
Insights from numerical modelling
This paper provides results from carrying out two-dimensional dynamic finite element analyses to determine the applicability of simple pseudo-static analyses for assessing seismic earth forces acting on embedded cantilever and propped retaining walls appropriate for New Zealand. In particular, this study seeks to determine if the free-field Peak Ground Acceleration (PGAff) commonly used in these pseudo-static analyses can be optimized. The dynamic finite element analyses considered embedded cantilever and propped walls in shallow (Class C) and deep (Class D) soils (NZS 1170.5:2004). Three geographical zones in New Zealand were considered. A total of 946 finite element runs confirmed that optimized seismic coefficients based on fractions of PGAff can be used in pseudo-static analyses to provide moderately conservative estimates of seismic earth forces acting on retaining walls. Seismic earth forces were found to be sensitive to and dependent on wall displacements, geographical zones and soil classes. A reclassification of wall displacement ranges associated with different geographical zones, soil classes and each of the three pseudo-static methods of calculations (Rigid, Stiff and Flexible wall pseudo-static solutions) is presented. The use of different ensembles of acceleration-time histories appropriate for the different geographic zones resulted in significantly different calculated seismic earth forces, confirming the importance of using geographic-specific motions. The recommended location of the total dynamic active force (comprising both static and dynamic forces) for all cases is 0.7H from the top of the wall (where H is the retained soil height).
NZ Transport Agency (2014). “Bridge Manual (SP/M/022)”. 3rd Edition, Amendment 1, 310 pp.
Okabe S (1926). “General Theory of Earth Pressures”. Journal of Japan Society of Civil Engineers, 12(1): 123-134.
Mononobe N and Matsuo M (1929). “On the Determination of Earth Pressures during Earthquakes”. Proceedings: World Engineering Congress, Japan, Tokyo, October – November 1929, 9, Paper No. 388,179-187.
Matthewson MB, Wood JH and Berrill JB (1980). “Seismic Design of Bridges” Section 9: Earth Retaining Structures”. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering, 13(3): 280-293.
Wood JH and Elms DG (1990). “Seismic Design of Bridge Abutments and Retaining Walls”. Transit New Zealand, Road Research Unit, 84(2).
Wood JH (1973). “Earthquake-Induced Soil Pressures on Structures”. PhD Thesis, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California, 327 pp.
Seed HB and Whitman RV (1970). “Design of Earth Retaining Structures for Dynamic Loads”. Proceedings: ASCE Specialty Conference on Lateral Stresses in the Ground and Design of Earth-Retaining Structures, United States, New York, Ithaca, June 1970, 103-147.
Greek Regulatory Guide E39/93 (1998). “Regulatory Guide E39/93 for the Seismic Analysis of Bridges”. Bulletin of Greek Technical Chamber No. 2040, Ministry of Public Works, Athens [in Greek].
Green RA, Olgun CG, Ebeling RM and Cameron WI (2003). “Seismically Induced Lateral Earth Pressures on a Cantilever Retaining Wall”. Proceedings of the 6th U.S. Conference and Workshop on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering (TCLEE), Advancing Mitigation Technologies and Disaster Response, USA, California, Long Beach, 10 – 13 August 2003, 946-955. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/40687(2003)96
Steedman RS and Zeng X (1990). “The Influence of Phase on the Calculation of Pseudo-Static Earth Pressure on a Retaining Wall”. Geotechnique 40(1): 103-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1918.104.22.168
Gazetas G, Psarropoulos PN, Anastasopoulos I and Gerolymos N (2004). “Seismic Behaviour of Flexible Retaining Systems Subjected to Short-Duration Moderately Strong Excitation”. Soil Dynamic and Earthquake Engineering, 24(7): 537-550. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2004.02.005
Psarropoulos PN, Klonaris G and Gazetas G (2005). “Seismic Earth Pressures on Rigid and Flexible Retaining Walls”. Journal of Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 25(7-10), 795-809.
Anderson DG, Martin GR, Lam I and Wang JN (2008). “Seismic Analysis and Design of Retaining Walls, Buried Structures, Slopes and Embankments”. National Cooperative Highway Research Program, Report 611, 148 pp.
Atik LA and Sitar N (2010). “Seismic Earth Pressures on Cantilever Retaining Structures”. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(10): 1324-1333. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000351
Standards New Zealand (2004). “NZS 1170.5: Structural Design Actions. Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand”. Standards New Zealand, Wellington, 80 pp.
Oyarzo-Vera C, McVerry GH and Ingham JM (2012). “Seismic Zonation and Default Suite of Ground-Motion Records for Time-History Analysis in the North Island of New Zealand”. Earthquake Spectra, 28(2): 667-688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000016
Tarbali K and Bradley BA (2014). “Representative Ground-Motion Ensembles for Several Major Earthquake Scenarios in New Zealand”. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(4): 231-252.
Mejia LH and Dawson EM (2006). “Earthquake Deconvolution for FLAC”. Proceedings of the 4th International FLAC Symposium on Numerical Modelling in Geomechanics. Spain, Madrid, 29 – 31 May 2006, 211-219.
Rathje EM and Kottke A (2013). “STRATA”. https://nees.org/resources/strata (Accessed 06/10/2015).
OpenSees (2006). “Open Source for Earthquake Engineering Simulation”. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/. (Accessed 06/10/2015).
GiD (2015). http://www.gidhome.com. (Accessed 06/10/2015).
MATLAB. http://www.mathworks.com (Accessed 06/10/2015).
Larkin T and Van Houtte C (2014). “Determination of Site Period for NZS1170.5:2004). Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 47(1): 28-40.
Kuhlemeyer RL and Lysmer J (1973). “Finite Element Accuracy for Wave Propagation Problems”. Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, Proc. ASCE, 99(SM5): 421-427.
Smith WD (1975). “The Application of Finite Element Analysis to Body Wave Propagation Problems”. Geophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society, 42(2): 747-768. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.1975.tb05890.x
Zhang Y, Conte JP, Yang Z, Elgamal A, Bielak J and Acero G (2008). ”Two-Dimensional Nonlinear Earthquake Response Analysis of a Bridge-Foundation-Ground System”. Earthquake Spectra 24(2): 343-386. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2923925
McGann CR and Arduino P (2015). “Dynamic 2D Effective Stress Analysis of Slope”. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/wiki/index.php/Dynamic_2D_Effective_Stress_Analysis_of_Slope (Accessed 10/10/2015).
Rathje EM, Faraj F, Russell S and Bray J (2004). “Empirical Relationships for Frequency Content Parameters of Earthquake Ground Motions”. Earthquake Spectra, 20(1): 119-144. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1643356
Parra-Colmenares EJ (1996). “Numerical Modeling of Liquefaction and Lateral Ground Deformation Including Cyclic Mobility and Dilation Response in Soil Systems”. PhD Thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY.
Drumm EC and Desai CS (1986). “Determination of Parameters for a Model for the Cyclic Behaviour of Interfaces”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 14: 1-18.
Geosolve (2013). “WALLAP Retaining Wall Analysis Program”. Version 6.05 Revision A45.B58.R49.
Scott MH and Fenves GL (2010). “Krylov Subspace Accelerated Newton Algorithm: Application to Dynamic Progressive Collapse Simulation of Frames”. Journal of Structural Engineering, 136(5): 473-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000143
Chin CY and Kayser C (2016). “Seismic Pressures on Retaining Walls”. University of Canterbury Quake Centre Report, Dated 14/03/16, 2913 pp.
Atik LA and Sitar N (2008). “Experimental and Analytical Study of the Seismic Performance of Retaining Structures”. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER) Report 2008/104, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 295 pp.
Copyright (c) 2016 C.Y. Chin, Claudia Kayser, Michael Pender
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.