Characterisation and seismic vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry buildings in Dunedin CBD
The need for Territorial Authorities (TA) to compile an earthquake-prone building register has been highlighted by the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission and with this in mind the following research was undertaken to enable the characterisation and assessment of potentially earthquake-prone historic unreinforced masonry (URM) buildings in Dunedin. To achieve the research goals, associated technical literature was reviewed and an earthquake-prone building register containing data on 226 URM buildings located in the Dunedin central business district (CBD) area was compiled. Additionally, structural performance of these buildings was also assessed using both the literature suggested initial evaluation procedure and the proposed risk based assessment method. It was estimated that 680 of the existing 750 Dunedin URM buildings are likely to be earthquake-prone and merit detailed assessment. It was also established that the earthquake risk in the city is primarily based on the fact that it has a significant number of URM buildings built prior to the introduction of building code, of which a large proportion is concentrated in the CBD. These not only pose a safety risk to their users but also to pedestrians on the adjacent footpaths.
DBHNZ. (2004) New Zealand Building Act 2004. Department of Building and Housing New Zealand (DBHNZ), Wellington (New Zealand).
CERC. (2011) Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Interim Report. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission (CERC), Christchurch (New Zealand), pp. 64.
Murashev, A. and Davey R. (2005) Seismic risk in the Otago region: study report. Ed. P. Brabhaharan and D. Spurr, Opus International Consultants Limited, Wellington (New Zealand), pp. 46.
Porteous, D. (2013) “Big unknown: Where Dunedin is in quake cycle”. Otago Daily Times. Retrieved from http://www.odt.co.nz/news/dunedin/243567/big-unknown-where-dunedin-quake-cycle.
DCC. (2012). Simplified hazard analysis for Dunedin. Dunedin City Council (DCC), Dunedin (New Zealand), Retrieved from http://www.dunedin.govt.nz/cd/getting-prepared/hazards.
DCC. (2012) Dunedin earthquake-prone building policy. Dunedin City Council (DCC), Dunedin (New Zealand), pp 16.
Findlay, M. (2009) “Theme 12: Retail and Commercial Development”. Dunedin Contextual Thermatic History. Dunedin City Council, Dunedin (New Zealand), 1, pp. 217-222.
Glassey, P., Barrell, D., Forsyth, J. and Macleod, R. (2003) “The geology of Dunedin, New Zealand, and the management of geoloical hazards”. Quaternary International 103(1): 23-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(02)00139-8
McCahon, I.F., Yetton, M.D. and Cook, D.R.L. (1993). The earthquake hazard in Dunedin: soils and foundations. Otago University Press, Wellington (New Zealand), pp. 178.
Adams, R.D. and Kean, J.R.. (1974) “The Dunedin earthquake 9 April, 1974: part 1 seismological studies”. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 7 (3), 115-122.
Bishop, D.G. (1974) “The Dunedin earthquake, 9 April, 1974: Part 2 local effects”. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 7(3), 123-129.
Sutherland, R. and Norris, R.J. (1995) “Late Quaternary displacement rate, paleoseismicity, and geomorphic evolution of the Alpine Fault: evidence from Hokuri Creek, South Westland, New Zealand” New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics 38(4), 419-430. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.1995.9514669
NZS. (2004) NZS 1170.5: Structural design actions. New Zealand Standard (NZS), Wellington (New Zealand).
Russell, A.P. and Ingham, J.M. (2010) “Prevalence of New Zealand's unreinforced masonry buildings”. Bulletin of the New Zealand National Society for Earthquake Engineering 43(3), 192-207.
Ingham, J.M. (2011) “Performance of Unreinforced Masonry Buildings in the 2010/2011 Canterbury Earthquakes: Part 1”. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission Hearing Presentation, from http://canterbury.royalcommission.govt.nz/documents-by-key/20111103.716.
NZSEE. (2006) Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in earthquakes. Recommendations of a New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE) study group on earthquake risk buildings, Wellington (New Zealand), pp. 343.
Copyright (c) 2013 Najif Ismail, Kieran McGrannachan, Glen Hazelton
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.