A review of post-earthquake building control policies with respect to the recovery of the Christchurch CBD

  • B.D. Galloway Holmes Consulting Group, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • H.J. Hare Holmes Consulting Group, Christchurch, New Zealand

Abstract

The Canterbury earthquake sequence was particularly disruptive for building owners and businesses located within the CBD. The initial damage to buildings in the relatively moderate September 2010 earthquake was surpassed by the significantly more damaging February 2011 event, challenging the way in which engineers have traditionally considered earthquake recovery.

Internationally, re-occupation of buildings following an earthquake has been based on the need to get businesses operating from buildings that are rapidly identified as having suffered minor structural damage. However, following the February 2011 earthquake, the shift in risk profile was reflected by limiting re-occupation unless it could be shown that the building also had a minimum capacity to resist earthquakes. This challenges the balance between continuing function and safety in the traditional post-earthquake evaluation process.

The timeframe for commencement of repairs has a significant impact on the speed of recovery. The importance of well defined regulations was highlighted in the well insured Christchurch building market, where legal arguments halted repairs in many instances. There is also a clear need for a modified, streamlined building consent process for the repair of earthquake damaged buildings.

This paper looks at the various building control policies enacted during the Canterbury earthquakes, and their effectiveness in aiding the recovery of the Christchurch CBD.

References

ATC-20. Procedures for postearthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Applied Technology Council, California, 1989.

ATC 52-4. Here today - here tomorrow: The road to earthquake resilience in San Francisco; Post earthquake repair and retrofit requirements, Applied Technology Council, California, 2010.

Building Act 2004. New Zealand Govt., 24 August 2004.

Canterbury Earthquake (Building Act) Order 2010, New Zealand Government, 16 September 2010.

Canterbury Earthquake Recovery Act 2011, New Zealand Government, 18 April 2011.

CCC 2010. Christchurch City Council Earthquake-prone, dangerous and insanitary buildings policy, 2010. Christchurch City Council, 10 September 2010.

CCC 2011. Report into building safety evaluation in the central business district following the 4 September 2010 earthquake: Technical report by the Christchurch City Council, Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, August 2011.

Civil Defence Emergency Management Act 2002, New Zealand Government, 17 October 2002.

EAG 2011. Guidance on detailed engineering evaluation of earthquake affected non-residential buildings in Canterbury (Draft): Part 2 evaluation procedure, Department of Building and Housing Engineering Advisory Group, 19 July 2011.

Hare, H.J. & Galloway, B.D. 2011. Building evaluation processes following the Darfield Earthquake. Proceedings of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering: Paper 162, NZSEE:Auckland, 14-16 April 2011.

Ingham, J. 2011, The performance of unreinforced masonry buildings in the 2010/2011 Canterbury earthquakes. Presentation to the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, November 2011.

NZSEE 2009. Building safety evaluation during a state of emergency: Guidelines for Territorial Authorities. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, August 2009.

NZSEE 2011. Building safety evaluation following the Canterbury earthquakes: Technical report by the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering. Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission, September 2011.

NZUSAR 2009. Level 2 USAR engineer student manual. New Zealand Urban Search and Rescue, 2009.

Published
2012-09-30
How to Cite
Galloway, B., & Hare, H. (2012). A review of post-earthquake building control policies with respect to the recovery of the Christchurch CBD . Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 45(3), 105-116. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.45.3.105-116
Section
Articles