Lifelines performance and management following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, New Zealand

Highlights of resilience

  • Sonia Giovinazzi University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Thomas Wilson University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Craig Davis Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, Los Angeles, USA
  • Daniel Bristow University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Max Gallagher University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Alistair Schofield University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • Marlene Villemure University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
  • John Eidinger G&E Engineering Systems Inc., Olympic Valley, USA
  • Alex Tang L&T Consultants, Mississauga, Canada

Abstract

A magnitude 6.3 earthquake struck the city of Christchurch at 12:51pm on Tuesday 22 February 2011. The earthquake caused 182 fatalities, a large number of injuries, and resulted in widespread damage to the built environment, including significant disruption to the lifelines. The event created the largest lifeline disruption in a New Zealand city in 80 years, with much of the damage resulting from extensive and severe liquefaction in the Christchurch urban area. The Christchurch earthquake occurred when the Canterbury region and its lifelines systems were at the early stage of recovering from the 4 September 2010 Darfield (Canterbury) magnitude 7.1 earthquake. This paper describes the impact of the Christchurch earthquake on lifelines by briefly summarising the physical damage to the networks, the system performance and the operational response during the emergency management and the recovery phase. Special focus is given to the performance and management of the gas, electric and road networks and to the liquefaction ejecta clean-up operations that contributed to the rapid reinstatement of the functionality of many of the lifelines. The water and wastewater system performances are also summarized. Elements of resilience that contributed to good network performance or to efficient emergency and recovery management are highlighted in the paper.

References

Beaven, J., Fielding, E., Motagh, M., Samsonov, S., Donnelly, N., (2011). Fault Location and Slip Distribution of the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch, New Zealand, Earthquake from Geodetic Data. Seismological Research Letters 82 (6): 789-799.

Bell, D.H. (2011). Geo-logic and the art of geotechnical practise. Geomechanics Lecture. New Zealand Geomechanics Society. Christchurch, 12 October 2011.

Brown, L.J., Beetham, R.S., Paterson, B.R., Weeber, J.H., (1995). Geology of Christchurch, New Zealand. Environmental and Engineering Geoscience 1 (4): 427-488.

Canterbury CDEM Group, (2010). Canterbury Civil Defence and Emergency Management Group Plan – Draft. Available from < http://www.cdemcanterbury.govt.nz/>; Accessed on 13 October 2011.

CDEM 2002. Civil Defence and Emergency Management Act. Ministry of Civil Defence and Emergency Management, New Zealand. Public Act 2002 N. 33.

Charman, N. and Billings, I. (2011). Christchurch City Council Lifelines- Performance of concrete potable water reservoirs in the February 2011 Christchurch earthquake. NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 4, December, (This issue).

Cousins, J., McVerry, G.H. (2010), Overview of Strong-Motion Data from the Darfield Earthquake, Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 43, No. 4, December 2010, pp222-227.

Cubrinovski and Taylor (2011).Liquefaction Map – Drive-through Reconnaissance Retrieved 27th August 2011 from http://db.nzsee.org.nz:8080/web/chch_2011/home

Cubrinovski, M. et al. (2011). Geotechnical Aspects of the 22 February 2011 Christchurch Earthquake, NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 4, December, (This issue).

Eidinger, J. and Tang, A. (Eds) (2011). Earthquake Sequence of Mw 7.1 September 04, 2010, Mw 6.3 February 22, 2011, Mw 6.0 June 13, 2011: Lifelines Performance. Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering. Monograph No. 40. December 2011. ASCE

Fulton, M. (2011). Fulton Hogan News publication. Available from: <http://www.fultonhogan.com/NewZealand/NewsPublications/index.htm> Accessed: 09/09/11

GeoNet 2011. Canterbury Earthquakes. Available from <http://www.geonet.org.nz/canterbury-quakes/>. Accessed 18 October 2011.

Guidotti, R., Stupazzini, M., Smerzini, C., Paolucci, R., Ramieri, P., (2011). Numerical Study on the Role of Basin Geometry and Kinematic Seismic Source in 3D Ground Motion Simulation of the 22 February 2011 Mw 6.2 Christchurch Earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 82 (6): pp767-782.

Johnston, D., Becker, J., Alloway, B., Manville, V. (2001), Auckland Engineering lifelines Group Volcanic Ash review-part1, Impacts on lifeline services and collection/disposal issues, version 1.0-May 2001.

Knight, S. (2011). Impact and Recovery of the Kaiapoi Water Supply Network following the September 4th 2010 Darfield Earthquake. Dept. of Civil and Natural Resources Engineering. University of Canterbury. Final Year Projects, 2011.

Koordinates 2011 http://koordinates.com/#/layer/3152-road-closures-up-to-25-feb-2011/webservices/ accessed 07/09/11

Massie, A. and Watson, N. R. (2011). Impact of the Christchurch earthquakes on the electrical power system infrastructure. NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 4, December, (This issue).

MCDEM, (2007). National Civil Defence Emergency Management Strategy, Department of Internal Affairs, Wellington. Accessed on 19 October 2011, Available from < http://www.civildefence.govt.nz/memwebsite.NSF/Files/National_CDEM_Strategy/$file/National-CDEM-strategy-2008.pdf>

McGhie, C. and Tudo-Bornarel, C. (2011). 4 September 2010 and 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquakes from a transmission infrastructure perspective: asset structural performance and lessons learned. EEA Conference and Exhibition 2011, 23-24 June 2011, Auckland.

Mackenzie, J.R. (2011). The Dallington Cable and Foot Bridge: A case study example of successful engineering lifeline mitigation. Proc. of the Ninth Pacific Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Building an Earthquake-Resilient Society. 14-16 April, 2011, Auckland, New Zealand.

NELC (2007). National Engineering Lifeline Committee Brochure. March 2007. Available from http://www.civildefence.govt.nz/memwebsite.NSF/Files/Lifelines%20files/$file/NELC-brochure.pdf; Accessed on 13 October 2011.

NZS1170.5. Structural Design Actions Part 5: Earthquake Actions – New Zealand, Standards New Zealand, 2004.

ORION AMP (2009). Asset Management Plan: a 10-year management plan for Orion‟s electricity network. from 1 April 2009 to 31 March 2019. http://www.oriongroup.co.nz/publications-and-disclosures/asset-management-plan.aspx

Orion Annual Report (2011) retrieved from: http://www.oriongroup.co.nz/downloads/OrionAR11_WEB.pdf

Orion Media releases (2010 and 2011) retrieved from http://www.oriongroup.co.nz/news-and-media/EQ-news-Feb2011.aspx. And the dates therein.

Palermo, A. et al (2011). Lessons Learnt from 2011 Christchurch Earthquakes: Analysis and Assessment of Bridges, NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 4, December, (This issue).

Park, J., Nojima, N., and Reed, D. (2006) Nisqually Earthquake Electric Utility Analysis. Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 22, No. 2, pp. 491-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2198872

Pettinga, J.R., (2011). The faults and historical earthquakes in the Canterbury region. Presentation to the Canterbury Earthquakes Royal Commission. October 2011.

Quigley, M., Van Dissen, R., Villamor, P., Litchfield, N., Barrell, D., Furlong, K., Stahl, T., Duffy, B., Bilderback, E,. Noble, D., Townsend, D., Begg, J., Jongens, R., Ries, W., Claridge, J., Klahn, A., Mackenzie, H., Smith, A., Hornblow, S., Nicol, R., Cox, S., Langridge, R., Pedley, K., (2010), Surface rupture of the Greendale Fault during the Mw 7.1 Darfield (Canterbury) earthquake, New Zealand: Initial Findings, New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering Bulletin, Vol. 43, No. 4, December 2010, pp236-242.

Quigley, M., Wilson, T.M., (2011). Standing Strong on Shaking Ground: Being a local earth scientist during a prolonged natural disaster (Canterbury earthquake sequence, 2010-2011). Greatest Natural Disasters of Our Time Workshop, IUGG, Melbourne, 27 June, 2011.

Schiff, Anshel J. (Ed.), (1995). Northridge Earthquake: Lifeline Performance and Post-Earthquake Response. Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Monograph No. 8, ASCE.

Schiff, Anshel J. (Ed.), 1998. Hyogo-Ken Nambu Earthquake of January 17, 1995-Lifeline. Technical Council on Lifeline Earthquake Engineering, Monograph No. 14, ASCE.

Stevenson, J. R., Kachali, H., Whitman, Z., Seville, E., Vargo, J., Wilson, T. (2011). Preliminary observation of the impacts of the 22 February Christchurch earthquake on organisations and the economy: a report from the field, (22 February – 22 March 2011). NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 44, No. 2, June 2011, pp65-76.

Transpower (2011a). “4 September 2010 Darfield earthquake. Lessons learned”. TRANSPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Internal Report, 30 March 2011.

Transpower (2011b). “22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake Key findings and lessons learned” TRANSPOWER NEW ZEALAND LIMITED Internal Report, 30 June 2011.

Watson, N.R. (2010). Impact of the Darfield earthquake on the electrical power system infrastructure”, NZSEE Bulletin, Vol. 43, No.4, December 2010, pp421- 424.

Weerasekara, S. (2011). Gastroenteritis hazard map for Kaiapoi 24-48 hours after the Darfield earthquake. Report for HAZM 403: Hazard and Disaster Investigation. Dept of Geological Sciences, University of Canterbury.

Yamada, S., Orense, R., Cubrinovski, M., (2011). Geotechnical Damage due to the 2011 Christchurch, New Zealand. ISSMGE Bulletin 5 (2): pp27-45.

Tonkin and Taylor (2011). Christchurch Earthquake 22 February 2011, Geotechnical Land Damage Assessment, Tonkin & Taylor Ltd, 2011.

Published
2011-12-31
How to Cite
Giovinazzi, S., Wilson, T., Davis, C., Bristow, D., Gallagher, M., Schofield, A., Villemure, M., Eidinger, J., & Tang, A. (2011). Lifelines performance and management following the 22 February 2011 Christchurch earthquake, New Zealand. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 44(4), 402-417. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.44.4.402-417
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)