Verification of spectral reduction factors for seismic assessment of bridges

  • C. Casarotti European Centre for Training and Research in Earthquake Engineering (EUCENTRE), Pavia, Italy
  • R. Monteiro University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
  • R. Pinho University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy

Abstract

Within a nonlinear static analysis procedure perspective for the assessment of structures, one of the key issues is the employment of a demand spectrum that takes also into account, through an adequate reduction of its spectral ordinates, the hysteretic energy dissipation capacity of the structure being assessed. There are certainly a relatively large number of past parametric studies dedicated to the validation of different approaches to translate such structural energy dissipation capacity into spectral reduction factors, however such studies have focused mainly, if not exclusively, on single-degree-of-freedom (SDOF) systems. It seems, therefore, that verification on full structural systems, such as complete bridges, is conspicuously needed in order to verify the adequacy of using existing SDOF-derived relationships in the assessment of multiple-degree-of-freedom (MDOF) systems. In this work, eleven different spectral reduction proposals, involving diverse combinations of previously proposed equivalent damping and spectral reduction equations, are evaluated, for various intensity levels, using a preliminarily validated nonlinear static procedure. A wide set of bridges, covering regular and irregular configurations as well as distinct support conditions, is used. The accuracy of the results is checked by direct comparison with Time-History Analyses performed with ten real ground motion records. Overall conclusions are then presented with the purpose of providing practitioners and researchers with indications on the most adequate spectral reduction schemes to be employed in nonlinear static analysis of bridges.

References

Fajfar, P. (1999), “Capacity spectrum method based on inelastic demand spectra”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 979-993. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<979::AID-EQE850>3.0.CO;2-1

Chopra, A.K. and Goel, R.K. (1999), “Capacity-Demand-Diagram methods based on inelastic design spectrum”. Earthquake Spectra, 15 (4), 637-656. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586065

Miranda, E. and Ruiz-García, J. (2002), “Evaluation of approximate methods to estimate maximum inelastic displacement demands”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 31, 539–560. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.143

Miranda, E. (2000), “Inelastic displacement ratios for structures on firm sites”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 126 (10), 1150–1159. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:10(1150)

Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2007), “An Adaptive Capacity Spectrum Method for assessment of bridges subjected to earthquake action”. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 5 (3), 377-390. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-007-9031-8

Pinho, R., Casarotti, C. and Monteiro, R. (2007), “An adaptive capacity spectrum method and other nonlinear static procedures applied to the seismic assessment of bridges”. Proceedings of the 1st US-Italy Seismic Bridge Workshop.

Pinho, R., Monteiro, R. and Casarotti, C. (2009), “Assessment of Continuous Span Bridges through Nonlinear Static Procedures”. Earthquake Spectra, in press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3050449

Rosenblueth, E. and Herrera, I. (1964), “On a kind of hysteretic damping”. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 90 (4). 37-48.

Applied Technology Council (1996), Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings. ATC-40 Report, Volumes 1 and 2. ATC, California, USA.

Kowalsky, M.J. (1994), “Displacement-based design – a methodology for seismic design applied to RC bridge columns”. Master’s Thesis, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, California.

Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M. (1974), “Inelastic response of reinforced concrete structures to earthquakes motions”. ACI Journal, 71. 604-610.

Iwan, W. D. (1980), “Estimating inelastic response spectra from elastic spectra”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8. 375–388. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290080407

Dwairi, H.M., Kowalsky, M.J. and Nau, J.M. (2007), “Equivalent damping in support of direct displacement-based design”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 11 (4), 512-530. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460601033884

Priestley, M.J.N., Calvi, G.M. and Kowalsky, M.J. (2007), Displacement-based Seismic Design of Structures. IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

Newmark, N.M. and Hall, W.J. (1982), Earthquake Spectra and Design. Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley.

Comité Europeen de Normalization (2005), Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, Part 2: Bridges. EN 1998-2, CEN, Brussels, Belgium.

Ramirez, O.M., Constantinou, M.C., Whittaker, A.S., Kircher, C.A. and Chrysostomou, C.Z. (2002), “Elastic and inelastic seismic response of buildings with damping systems”. Earthquake Spectra, 18 (3), 531–547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1509762

Lin, Y.Y. and Chang, K.C. (2003), “A study on damping reduction factors for buildings under earthquake ground motions”. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering, 129 (2), 206–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2003)129:2(206)

Vidic, T., Fajfar, P. and Fischinger, M. (1994), “Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 23 (5), 507-521. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.4290230504

Casarotti, C., Pinho, R. and Calvi, G.M. (2005), Adaptive pushover based methods for seismic assessment and design of bridge structures. ROSE Research Report No. 2005/06, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.

SAC Joint Venture (1997), “Develop Suites of Time Histories”. Project Task: 5.4.1, Draft Report, March 21, Sacramento, CA, USA.

Bommer, J.J. and Martinez-Pereira, A. (1999), “The effective duration of earthquake ground motion”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 3 (2), 127-172. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469909350343

SeismoSoft (2006), SeismoStruct – a computer program for static and dynamic nonlinear analysis of framed structures, available online from http://www.seismosoft.com.

Casarotti, C. and Pinho, R. (2006), “Seismic response of continuous span bridges through fibre-based finite element analysis”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 5 (1), 119-131. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-006-0631-0

Antoniou, S. and Pinho, R. (2004), “Development and verification of a displacement-based adaptive pushover procedure”. Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 8 (5), 643-661. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13632460409350504

Pinho, R., Casarotti, C. and Antoniou, S. (2007), “A comparison of single-run pushover analysis techniques for seismic assessment of bridges”. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 36 (10), 1347-1362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/eqe.684

Bertero, V. V. (1995), “Tri-services manual methods”. Vision 2000 performance based seismic engineering of buildings, Structural Engineer Association of California, Vol. 1, Part 2, Appendix J, J1–J8.

Bertero, V. V., Anderson, J. C., Krawinkler, H. and Miranda, E. (1991), “Design guidelines for ductility and drift limits”. Rep. No. EERC/UCB 91/15, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., University of California, Berkeley

Reinhorn, A. M. (1997), “Inelastic analysis techniques in seismic evaluations”. Seismic design methodologies for the next generation of codes, P. Fajfar and H. Krawinkler, eds., Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, 277–287.

Fajfar, P. (2000), “A nonlinear analysis method for performance-based seismic design”. Earthquake Spectra, 16 (3), pp. 573–592. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1586128

Published
2009-06-30
How to Cite
Casarotti, C., Monteiro, R., & Pinho, R. (2009). Verification of spectral reduction factors for seismic assessment of bridges. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 42(2), 111-121. https://doi.org/10.5459/bnzsee.42.2.111-121
Section
Articles